Killing and letting die
Saunders W. J Adv Nurs. If we accept that active euthanasia is wrong, then we accept as a universal rule that people should be permitted to suffer severe pain before death if that is the consequence of their disease.
When self-determination runs amok. Callahan D. The Abrahamic religions; Islam, Christianity, and Judaism, all argue for the sanctity of life. Dickey N.
If the doctor agrees, she has two choices about what to do: The doctor stops giving A the drugs that are keeping him alive, but continues pain killers - A dies 3 days later, after having been in pain despite the doctor's best efforts.
The moral distinction between killing and letting die in medical cases.
Killing and letting die essay
In such cases, killing does not involve taking any further responsibility and letting die does not avoid taking any responsibility. According to the doctrine of acts and omissions Smith is morally guiltier than Jones, since he actively killed the child, while Jones just allowed the boy to die. The Groningen protocol: making infanticide legal does not make it moral. In law Smith is guilty of murder and Jones isn't guilty of anything. I just let him die. Church has always condemned abortion, Beals DA. Asscher J 1. Euthanasia in the Netherlands.
Killing and letting die. Husak DN.
Killing and letting die
New York: Oxford University Press; J Med Ethics. Gesang B. Does the distinction between killing and letting die justify some forms of euthanasia? Moral duties and euthanasia: why to kill is not necessarily the same as to let die? Accessed 11 September Arthur Hugh Clough There is no real difference But some people think this distinction is nonsense, since stopping treatment is a deliberate act, and so is deciding not to carry out a particular treatment. Philos Rev. As he enters the bathroom he sees the boy fall over, hit his head on the side of the bath, and slide face-down under the water. An objection to this analogy You might argue that we can't compare the case of a doctor who is trying to do their best for their patient with Smith and Jones who are obvious villains. In that case, we might think that the doctor had a good defence against accusations of unethical behaviour. In: Rachels J, eds. He arrives in casualty.
Acts and omissions: killing and letting die. Quinn WS.
based on 88 review