Guideline for article review
Your textbook may contain a helpful bibliography; Examine the work carefully to see whether the subject and treatment are appealing to you.
Clearly outline the order in which every sub-topic will be discussed to give the reader background information needed to understand the sections in the article. If so, check out the free tutorials on the Elsevier Researcher Academy Respond to the invitation as soon as you can even if it is to decline — a delay in your decision slows down the review process and means more waiting for the author.
Article review template
Conclusions This section is usually no more than a few paragraphs and may be presented as part of the results and discussion, or in a separate section. The material reviewed should be related to the theme of your term paper, if that is a course requirement. Don't just give a short, cursory remark such as 'great, accept'. For example: MyNameR1. If you're following an informal report format you could structure your report in three sections: summary, major issues, minor issues. These questions are to hone your skills in critical thinking about research methodology. What can reviewers do to help? Is the thesis of the book well supported? Authors should describe and discuss the overall story formed. In particular, bear in mind that some journals will not want the recommendation included in any comments to authors, as this can cause editors difficulty later - see Section 11 for more advice about working with editors. Your written review will be approximately 2 - 3 single-spaced typed pages. If you are given a choice, try to find a work that interests you. Other Considerations. I post on Blackboard a list of journals that are accessible through the library's research portal. Following these steps will help you in writing a useful review: Summarize the article.
Why or why not? See Improving the Manuscript Recommending Revision Where improvements are needed, a recommendation for major or minor revision is typical. It may require more than one paragraph to cover them. What methods did the authors use to reach conclusions? In a critique, include an indication of the work's merit in the field.
based on 117 review